@mofosyne wrote:
Agreed. This discussion about
<div>
block syntax sounds related to Content Block/Inline SyntaxI haven't seen any objection for fenced
:::
as the<div>
block syntax. And I think it's also a good candidate for fencing generic detectives that can fall back as normal content.Since github does (where 'ruby' is a css class name I think):
```ruby require 'redcarpet' markdown = Redcarpet.new("Hello World!") puts markdown.to_html ```
then a direct eqv using the spoiler example for div would be:
:::spoiler spoiler content here :::
to which we can prettify it like so (perhaps classnames should have no spacing):
:::::::spoiler:::::::: spoiler content here ::::::::::::::::::::::
What do you think about this approach @vitaly ?